Some Evidence on Short-Run Market Overreaction for the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66674/bc5e8h41Abstract
‘This study attempts to test for the existence of short-run overreaction among shares traded on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange over the 1990s. A substantial literature based on data from devel- oped markets suggests that investors overreact to information such that returns exhibit a mean- reverting patter. This paper examines whether Malaysian returns exhibit a similar predictable pattem. For the past generation, the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) has been one of the most domi- nant themes in finance literature. At its most basic level, this hypothesis argues that share price changes should not be predicted from historic data. However, a number of market anomalies have begun to emerge which have challenged this hypothesis. For example, empirical evidence sug- gests that share returns may be predictable in certain months of the ear (Gultekin and Gultekin; 1983), 0n certain days in the week (French; 1980) and at particular times in the trading day (Harris; 1986). In addition, shares of smaller companies (Banz; 1981) and low P/E companies (Basu; 1977, 1983) seem to exhibit a recurring pattern. However, one of the newest and most controver- sil of these anomalies i the hypothesis that the market tends to overreact to news. The overreac- tion effect suggests that investors overreact to new information and as a result share prices can and do depart from their underlying fundamental values. As investors recognise their mistake, share: prices return to equilibrium levels imparting a mean-reverting pattern on share returns.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Noraini Mohd. Ariffin, David M. Power (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant Capital Markets Review the right of first publication. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This licence permits sharing and adaptation for any purpose, including commercial use, provided appropriate credit is given, a link to the licence is supplied and any changes are indicated. Third-party material excluded from the article's licence must be clearly identified, and authors are responsible for obtaining any required permission.